Customer Login  |  

by Matt Manning

We built Information Evolution to pursue the holy grail of database ownership: true real-time accuracy in a world where databases degrade at a rapid pace. A lofty goal, but today we do see cases where large-scale monitoring systems come within spitting distance of making this goal a reality.

The methodology—harvesting-monitoring-updating—is conceptually very simple. It does, however, take significant upfront investments and offshore resources to pull it off. First of all, you need to identify the sources of the data to harvest. Then you need to accurately harvest the desired data, fielding it as you go. Next is setting up the “pinging” mechanism to monitor changes and trigger alerts. And finally comes the act of analyzing the alert and either updating a database or using the “false positive” result to train the monitoring mechanism so it avoids future false positives.

Once it’s set up, though, on-going maintenance costs are modest because research is extremely fast and targeted. The majority of alerts lead to timely updates, the system gets better over time, and the cost-per-update becomes far lower than alternate approaches.

Event-driven Updates

Data changes when an event happens, for example when someone is hired or fired, a product is offered for sale for the first time, a price changes, or an organization acts in a certain way (signing deals, relocating, opening a new office, going into a new line of business, filing a government document, etc.). To be aware of an event that has just happened, there needs to be a way to “see” the source data indicating the event. This can be a new or changed web page, a mention in an RSS feed, an update to a LinkedIn profile, or a Twitter, blog, or Facebook post.

Almost all of these event indicators occur after the event itself has taken place. The key is the speed with which these indicators can be gathered and filtered for true changes. The recent hubbub around Dataminr, a Twitter-driven alert service, clearly showed how valuable a 1-hour “jump” on traditional news services can be to users where speed means money in the bank.

Fresh Data

In the world of data publishing, the effect of near-real-time updating is no less striking. A major school data provider, for instance, uses Connotate* to monitor tens of thousands of schools in the US to ensure that, for instance, every replacement of a 1st grade teacher is captured within days of the event. This may not mean much to folks interested in breaking news, but for those selling to teachers, a virgin list of newly appointed fifth grade math teachers can easily be the difference between earning a bonus or having to find a new job.

* Information Evolution is Connotate’s small- and medium-sized business partner.

{ 0 comments }

posted by Shyamali Ghosh on October 1, 2014

by Kevin Dodds

It’s expensive to staff a call center with full-time, highly trained callers. There are also substantial upfront and ongoing costs for technology—routing, dialers, headsets, etc. When you add the fact that projects are often seasonal and need both lightning-fast execution and high-quality results, managing telephone-based projects can seem almost impossible. Crowdsourcing has the potential to change all that.

Using the latest crowdsourcing platform technology from WorkFusion, we at IEI have been able to successfully use the crowd to complete high-volume, tight turnaround calling campaigns with the same degree of success that we have when using our own in-house dedicated call center.

How it Works

To qualify for calling campaigns, workers use their own personal computers to take a series of tests. Once they have passed and are “credentialed,” they can select a project in the job queue and go through another round of testing specific to that project. Once they have passed this test, they are formally approved to start calling. Then, based on specific criteria, numbers are assigned to them for calling. They click on the “call” button, get connected, read their script, enter the appropriate data, and end the call.

We use this crowd calling approach for “burstable” capacity because, once set up, it’s easy to ramp up or down. The other options that crowd-based based calling opens up, however, are even more game-changing and include:

  • Same language/same region calling: Callers in France calling companies in France; callers in the US Deep South calling companies in the Deep South, etc.
  • Tight controls over calling “windows”: Campaigns can be set up to run at specific times of the day to call a particular type of company in a given time zone for the highest likelihood of success in terms of connects and responses.
  • Quality controls: Each call is recorded for concurrent external QA reviews, quickly triggering additional training or agent removal, if necessary.

This adds up to the dawn of a brand new day when it comes to telephone-based data verification projects.

{ 0 comments }

posted by Shyamali Ghosh on September 15, 2014