Customer Login  |  

by Shyamali Ghosh

Frei 4

A glimpse of old-school data collection and dissemination as seen on a tour through the Sprudelhof, Bad Nauheim's turn of the century bathing complex, one of the International Competitive Intelligence Conference 2012's social events.

Competitive intelligence (CI) is a craft used primarily by large, multinational corporations—think Nestle, IBM, and Novartis—to steer strategy. Keeping an eye on technology developments, competitor sales data, or the movements of key industry players are all common CI practices and, while many may confuse CI with corporate espionage, most of the information analyzed is freely available via open sources.

Last week dozens of these in-house competitive intelligence practitioners gathered in Bad Nauheim, Germany to attend a conference held by the Institute for Competitive Intelligence. I was there to understand how to improve IEI’s CI research practices, and here is my brief assessment of the current state of this important market for information services.

The amount of data gathered and analyzed by companies depends on their size and industry, but multinational consumer goods companies are among the largest consumers of CI services. These firms constantly monitor and analyze multiple streams of real-time data including social media conversations, ecommerce data, and competitor web site activity by using high-end data extraction tools and crowdsourcing (two of IEI’s practice areas). In other cases, for example to gain detailed information on emerging new technologies, only in-depth primary research with industry experts and think-tanks will do. In either case, the design of the data-gathering process remains the key to the accuracy and timeliness of the final analysis. Key questions include: Where is key information available? How can we get it quickly and cost-effectively? How do we feed it into our analysis routines?

Elvis Presley Platz

Elvis Presley Platz, Bad Nauheim, Germany, just across the street from the venue for the International Competitive Intelligence Conference 2012.

The data is out there, and there’s more of it every day, so the CI practitioner’s challenge has become how to gather, standardize, sift, and analyze all of it fast enough to give their employers a competitive advantage. In many ways the practice of CI is similar to the editorial side of the publishing industry, which exists to keep their customers on top of their industry or profession’s latest trends. In fact, there are several large erstwhile publishing firms like IHS that have very successful high-end industry intelligence services and offer custom consulting services, too. When the project is just too sensitive to trust with outside vendors, it can only be handled in-house. That doesn’t mean, however, that all the raw data gathering and structuring can’t be outsourced or crowdsourced, and we expect to see a lot more of this in the near future.

{ 0 comments }

posted by Shyamali Ghosh on April 2, 2012

As social media continues its inevitable march toward connecting all forms of sentient life, the issue of whether there is a “bright line” between business and personal information that salespeople cannot cross is coming to the fore. In other words, just because you can now know a lot of personal information about a sales prospect via their various social media profiles, should you in fact use that info?

And if so, what will the emerging etiquette be for prospectors? Two weeks ago InsideView’s Insider Summit, a gathering of their faithful customers, generated a lot of discussion on this point and SXSW Interactive last week had multiple sessions that touched on the same topic.

What’s the consensus? Well, it seems like everyone agrees there is indeed a line between “engaged” and “creepy,” but plenty of folks have recent war stories about how they took a piece of social information (a passion for bow ties, mountain biking, or boxing) and used it to close an erstwhile “business-to-business” sale. Other speakers and participants adamantly asserted that working that info into a sales pitch was an immediate disqualifier. So, it seems as if everyone more or less agrees that the information is valuable, but it’s just a matter of how you use it and what side of the bed your prospect woke up on that morning.

But, if social information (otherwise known as biographical information) is good to know, then what is the best kind of info to know? The information service Boardroom Insiders specifically digs deep into interpersonal connections between mentors and mentees, former co-workers, people who spoke on the same industry conference panel, or sat on the same nonprofit board. That information is rarely available on LinkedIn or other profiles, but it reveals extremely strong connections between people and organizations that can be critically important, especially for sales to C-level prospects at large firms.

We may on the cusp of a new era when B2B sales take on a more casual, social dimension, but great, hard-to-find data will always hold the key to giving a salesperson a true “edge” over their competition.

{ 0 comments }

posted by Shyamali Ghosh on March 26, 2012